Summary Plan Description Language Ruled Unenforceable

  • Precision
  • October 2nd, 2014

A decision handed down yesterday, September 30, 2014 by the United States District Court Central District of California in Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, LA CV 12-06693-VBF.

The following analysis come to us from Professor Roger Baron:

Yesterday the U.S. District  Court for California, Central Division (Los Angeles) entered its ruling that the Motion Picture Industry ERISA plan's reimbursement provisions are enforceable because they are contained only in the plan's Summary Plan Description (SPD) and not in a Plan Document.  This situation which developed here was especially burdensome for the ERISA beneficiary and her family.  The ERISA plan had paid $148,000 of medical bills and then demanded the victim turn over her entire tort recovery of $100,000, plus interest.  When the victim refused, the ERISA plan quit providing health coverage for the victim and her entire family of four. 

Continue Reading
Summary Plan Description Language Ruled Unenforceable
View More

Do You Have Questions Regarding Your Client’s Public Benefits Eligibility?

Give the Attorneys at Precision a call at 888.961.LIEN

Stay in the know.

We are dedicated to keeping attorneys informed about cases and changes in the law that will impact their practice. Subscribe to our newsletter to and gain access to analysis of the most recent case law & legislative updates impacting your practice, as well as information about upcoming events & seminars.

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Paramount Settlement Planning, LLC, 3686 Seneca Street, Buffalo, NY, 14224, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact